There are three separate reports for state, local government, and local education which throw a lot of distracting numbers at you but, when added up, show that after an amazing 1/3rd reduction in the total OPEB Liability (from $110 billion as of 6/30/16 to under $74 billion as of 6/30/19) the state actuaries sharply reversed course.
Here is how they did it.
From 6/30/16 to 6/30/19 there was a $54 billion reduction due to ‘Differences Between Expected and Actual Experience’ and ‘Changes of Assumptions’. Who has been choosing the assumptions you may ask. From the cover letter to the reports:
The Plan Sponsor selected the economic and demographic assumptions and prescribed them for use for purposes of compliance with GASB 75.
From 6/30/19 to 6/30/20 there was a $47 billion increase due to ‘Differences Between Expected and Actual Experience’ and ‘Changes of Assumptions’. Why would the Plan Sponsor want to suddenly make these benefits appear more valuable?
Posted by NJ OPEB Update – 2020 – Actuarial News on April 26, 2022 at 11:15 am
[…] Link: https://burypensions.wordpress.com/2022/04/26/nj-opeb-update-2020/ […]
Posted by NJ Debt Dilemma | Burypensions Blog on June 21, 2022 at 10:13 am
[…] debt is the issue and we explain it here. Politicians wanted to make that debt first seem lower and then, for 2020, higher. The actuaries […]