NJ Actuarial Report Contributions

The July 1, 2016 actuarial reports for the New Jersey Retirement System plans are out and their main practical purpose is delineating the contributions for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. That total contribution amount would be $6,768,969,201 except we have laws that bring it down to $4,260,031,483 ($2,508,937,717 by the state and $1,751,093,766 by localities) with public workers expected to contribute another $1,977,904,061.

By far the largest portion of that total calculated contribution (84.6%) is the 30-year amortization of the underfunding which comes to $5,724,532,942 and develops through a combination of missed contributions and absurdly understated liability values.  Here are two worksheets taken from contribution exhibits with some observations:

.

.

  1. In theory public employees cover though their contributions 67% of benefits being accrued ($4,504 out of $6,685 annually) but that’s only because that $6,685 amount is ridiculously undervalued.
  2. For some reason member contributions are expected to stay steady overall and for some plans (Teachers, PFRS, and State Police) even decrease.

2 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by skip3house on March 20, 2017 at 9:54 am

    ‘…..missed contributions and absurdly understated….’ will this be understood by those who live/die by pension underfunding?

    Thank you for your continuing efforts, but getting very difficult to follow your reasoning jumps…my age I think? 2018 fiscal year doesn’t help. Regards

    MrSkipHouse@aol.com

    Reply

  2. […] « NJ Actuarial Report Contributions […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: