Mine Workers Pension Bailout Too?

Health benefits are the immediate concern as participants in the United Mine Workers of America 1974 (UMWA) Pension Plan are unlikely to see any significant cuts in their pensions  primarily because the average retiree receives about $6,900 annually, far less than the PBGC guarantee, so even after exhaustion of all  trust assets by 2025 the Mine Workers will likely have the PBGC continuing to pay most of their benefits (unless of course the PBGC itself goes belly-up by then too).

Yesterday S175 was introduced by Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.V.):

A bill to amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to transfer certain funds to the Multiemployer Health Benefit Plan and the 1974 United Mine Workers of America Pension Plan, and for other purposes.

Immediately following S176 was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell titled:

A bill to amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to transfer certain funds to the Multiemployer Health Benefit Plan, and for other purposes.

Both bills propose funneling money past April from the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund to pay health benefits to “orphaned” retired miners and their dependents left adrift by coal companies that have gone bankrupt. However S175 also wants the UMWA Pension Plan to get some money.  The question is from where?

According to Politico.com:

Critics of Manchin’s bill have called it a government bailout, since it would fund the pension plan using money from the Treasury.

 

7 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Anonymous on January 18, 2017 at 7:58 pm

    Coal for the soul, let’s fuel the fire…..

    Reply

    • Posted by Anonymous on January 21, 2017 at 7:07 pm

      Reviving coal production, full return of black lung disease, dismantle the Affordable Care Act, this is the agenda a silly, foolish man, shame on Republicans for following, the ethically challenged Trumputin.

      Reply

  2. Posted by Anonymous on January 19, 2017 at 9:40 am

    http://www.epi.org/publication/why-negotiating-great-trade-deals-is-not-the-answer/

    Even if Trump’s trade agenda were redesigned to help manufacturing, the benefits would be offset by the rest of his agenda, which is contrary to the interests of working people.

    Reply

  3. Posted by George on January 19, 2017 at 9:55 am

    Bailout might be the wrong term. When the Fed and the treasury bailout out the banks, they did that without legislative approval. This is more US senators and representatives using the power of the purse to help a favored constituency, which is what senators and representatives are tasked to do in a republic. Maybe ‘pork’ is the right term. It might be nice if West Virginia came up with a more universal solution to health care funding. It is also not clear what the plan is for reclaiming open pit mines, although I suspect there never was a plan.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: