Special Master of Mankind

All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.

– Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

Ironic that when it was decided with MPRA to have retirees in multiemployer (union) pension plans take the hit for an unsustainable system the executioner was dubbed ‘Special Master.’

In a letter to Congress explaining why the Central States application was rejected Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew provided clues as to where this is headed:

Our decision on the Central States application means that approximately 270,000 Central States participants will not face reductions to their pension benefits this July. While we expect that this will come as a relief to these participants, our decision does not resolve the issues threatening their pension benefits. The Central States plan, like a number of other multiemployer plans, remains severely underfunded and is projected to become insolvent within the next 10 years. Moreover, absent congressional action, by the time the Central States plan becomes insolvent, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) multiemployer insurance fund- which insures part of those benefits- may itself already be insolvent.


Importantly, Central States may choose to reapply and propose even larger cuts in order to meet the requirements of Kline-Miller.

We urge Congress to consider carefully the issues that have emerged, even as we continue to carry out our assigned responsibilities to implement Kline-Miller. Finding a balanced solution will require painful choices, but we must work together to preserve the promise of retirement security that these workers have bargained for and earned. We stand ready to work together and look forward to engaging further on this important issue.

If the idea is to protect the benefits of participants in multemployer plans then the obvious solution is to raise the limit on the amount of benefits that PBGC covers and have the Central States Pension Fund (CSPF) taken over by the PBGC.  This would  “preserve the promise of retirement security that these workers have bargained for and earned” but leave nothing for others, specifically:

  • PBGC (and other pension sponsors paying premiums and eventually taxpayers that would have to prop it up),
  • those currently running (and being paid out of) the CSPF, and
  • Congress which will need to start paying for past promises rather than future favors.

2 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Anonymous on May 11, 2016 at 10:21 pm

  2. Posted by MJ on May 12, 2016 at 10:02 am

    Not only is this guy the poster child for all that is wrong in NJ politics he is also the poster child for the unsustainability of the NJ pension system………..one must wonder why all of these publics keep voting him back into office as opposed to rallying around the statehouse to get rid of him and all of the other cheats, liars, triple dippers and no show jobbers……there would be lots of extra money for a lot of things.

    Thanks for the article, quite an eye opener!


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: