Why Christie Shouldn’t Win

Paul Mulshine wrote another “Christie-can’t-win” column where he critiqued Christie’s speech last Saturday in Iowa but missed the main point. In reviewing the youtube clip of the speech where Christie said nothing of substance but said it forcefully there was a telling 51 seconds:



.
The issue was deporting illegal immigrants this time but it could easily have been one of the thousands of ex-NJ public employees who retired out of state and had their pensions cut or someone displaced out of state by Hurricane Sandy. If this is what you tolerate as an acceptable response to the problems of others then when you seek redress from your government on some issue of importance to you but not to the politician representing you don’t be surprised to hear….

.


.
in response to:
.

6 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Anonymous on January 27, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    Of course he cant win, because he obese. Isnt that the American way, prejudice against fat people. Sounds stupid and ridiculous but it is true unfortunately.

    Reply

  2. Posted by Anonymous on January 27, 2015 at 8:00 pm

    There are better puppets in the Koch Collection so he will be an also-ran, but his campaign war chest will be filled to payoff Bridgegate. Maybe he will serve as AG in the Koch Administration or get one of 45 permanent Keystone Pipeline Jobs since Koch industries own many companies associated with this pipeline. CC really is a Soprano cousin CC, so sad.

    Reply

    • Posted by Tough Love on January 27, 2015 at 8:06 pm

      Maybe he’ll become an MD, and cure the deadliest cancer of all ….. Public Sector Unions

      Reply

      • Posted by Tough Love for Tough Love on January 27, 2015 at 8:42 pm

        Lol.in tough love’s world, we are all slaves that should be greatful to work for free. Check out #4 TL… http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-24/what-crispin-odey-and-his-124-billion-aum-thinks-are-6-risks-underpriced-market

        Reply

        • Posted by Tough Love on January 27, 2015 at 9:23 pm

          “free” ?

          I doubt there exists a NON-Public-Sector-worker/retiree family in NJ that wouldn’t be tickled pink if we could only bring Public Sector “Total compensation” way down to that of comparable Private Sector workers.

          Yes, Public Sector Unions are a CANCER inflicted upon society, and perhaps we should describe those with the insatiable greed common to many Public Sector workers/retirees, a “malignancy”.

          Reply

        • Posted by Tough Love on January 27, 2015 at 9:35 pm

          Your link compare Unionized vs Non-Unionized PRIVATE Sector workforces.

          I have no issue with PRIVATE Sector Unions. Reasonable market forces and competition keep them from getting out of control, I don’t pay their salaries, pensions, or benefits, and if they cause their employer to raise prices too high, I can shop elsewhere.

          It’s PUBLIC Sector Unions, where “market forces” and competition doesn’t exit to control the madness.

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: