Who Said We Fixed the New Jersey Pension System in 2011?

Today: “no one in their right mind would say that what we did in ’11 totally fixed a problem that is in the 30-40 billion dollar range”
.

.
but they did:
.

.

.

9 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Anonymous on May 21, 2014 at 9:11 am

    If pensions are reduced or even eliminated, taxpayers will still pay through the nose because politicians will continue to take everything they can get their greedy hands on. Scary but true. Keep your heads in the sand, it feels better that way.

    Reply

    • Posted by Tough Love on May 21, 2014 at 10:52 am

      Perhaps true, but them BOTH the Private Sector workers (with little or no pensions) and the newly de-pensioned Public Sector workers can join together …… to improve the lot of everybody, NOT just that of the Public Sector workers.

      Reply

      • Posted by Javagold on May 21, 2014 at 12:17 pm

        CORRECT.

        Reply

      • Posted by Anonymous on May 21, 2014 at 12:47 pm

        Good luck with that pipe dream!

        Reply

        • Posted by Tough Love on May 21, 2014 at 1:25 pm

          Quoting Christie …. “Our problem is we have made promises to people that we cannot keep, and so we have to adjust this,”

          Did you notice that he said “cannot”, not “will not”.
          ——————————————————————–

          The Public Sector pension/healthcare pig-fest (80-90% on the Taxpayers’ dime) is coming to an end.

          Reply

  2. Posted by Anonymous on May 21, 2014 at 2:49 pm

    You believe Chris Christie, you also believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny! lmao

    Reply

    • Posted by Tough Love on May 22, 2014 at 1:03 pm

      I believe Gov. Christie when he says …”Our problem is we have made promises to people that we cannot keep”…… emphasis on “cannot” (not “will not”).

      Not because he said it, but because unlike you, I’m not a greedy Public Sector worker in a perpetual state if denial, and I understand the math.

      Reply

  3. Posted by Anonymous on May 25, 2014 at 6:07 pm

    Was it chapter 1 or chapter 78 that was supposed to oblige them to paying the ADC?

    And how does the state not paying the ADC impact the municipalities in the two systems with local and state? Is all the accounting independent?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: