Jig Is Up for Public Plan Actuaries

Today the New York Times noticed though they framed it as a dispute between two camps.  There is no dispute.  All you need is a working knowledge of annuities and government and the facts of the situation are indisputable.

If the critics are right about that, it means even the cities that diligently follow their actuaries’ instructions, contributing the required amounts each year, are falling behind, and they don’t even know it.

Because they don’t WANT to know it and will NEVER employ anyone who could possibly wise them up.  Public plan actuaries are hired guns selling the their credentials to clients who demand to be lied to.   They oblige.

bloodletting was commonly thought to be one of the best ways to treat the plague. The blood that exuded was black, thick and vile smelling with a greenish scum mixed in it.

Eight hundred years from now the wikipedia entry on defined benefit plans in the public sector could include a similar passage:

asset-smoothing and 8% interest assumptions were commonly thought to be one of the best ways to treat underfunded plans. The actuarial reports that exuded were black, thick and vile smelling with a greenish scum mixed in it.

One response to this post.

  1. Posted by matthew house on July 21, 2013 at 6:09 am

    Old story about ‘How much do you want 2 + 3 to be’

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: